Lycoena
Number: | 16630.0 | |
---|---|---|
Author: | Nicholl | |
Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/43946#page/130/mode/2up | |
Family: | Lycaenidae | |
Genus: | Lycoena | |
Journal: | Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. | |
Year: | 1901 | |
Homonym Count: | 1.0 | |
Page: | 92 | |
Ref Id: | 4234.0 | |
Status: | Junior objective synonym | |
Subfamily: | Polyommatinae | |
Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
Tribe: | Polyommatini | |
Volume: | 1901 | |
Senior Syn: | PLEBEJUS | |
Senior Syn Author: | Kluk | |
Senior Syn Page: | 89 | |
Senior Syn Year: | 1780 | |
Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
Type Des Ref Id: | 6908.0 | |
Type Des: | by subsequent designation by | |
Type Des Author: | Cowan | |
Type Des Year: | 1970 | |
Type Des Journal: | Annot. rhop. | |
Type Des Title: | Annotationes Rhopalocerologicae | |
Type Des Page: | 483 | |
Type Sp Author: | Linnaeus | |
Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/10277#page/504/mode/2up | |
Type Sp Journal: | Systema Naturae | |
Type Sp Page: | 483 | |
Type Sp Series: | (Edn 10) | |
Type Sp Volume: | 1 | |
Type Sp Year: | 1758 | |
Type Sp Ref Id: | 3527.0 | |
Type Sp Genus: | Papilio | |
Type Sp: | argus | |
Memo Links: | ['http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=LYCOENA', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycaenidae'] | |
Memo: | Cowan (1970: 11) stated:- Although surely a misprint for Lycaena, it is technically not possible to treat this name so. Mary De la Beche Nicholl published her list of Lebanon Butterflies (annotated by H. J. Elwes) in the usual way. Species Nos. 68-91, the last 24 in the Lycaenidae, all bore generic names which began with the letter L. Number 68 was Lampides baetica, and the generic name of the next four species was denoted by the letter L. Number 73 was given as Lycoena argus, and 74-87 were all given the abbreviation L. Then number 88 was given as Lycaena argiolus, followed by the last three with the letter L. It is only possible to regard the list as giving in his section the three genera Lampides, Lycoena and Lycaena. By the type-designation made above, Lycoena Nicholl, 1901 is invalid as a junior objective synonym of Plebejus Kluk, 1802. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/16611/1677508006952
Retrieved: 22 Apr 2025 14:59:29 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/16611
Retrieved: 22 Apr 2025 14:59:29 (UTC)
Additional Information
Format | unknown |
---|---|
License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
Dataset | buttmoth |
Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |