Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Mesoacidalia

Number: 17658.0
Author: Reuss
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Mesoacidalia
Journal: Dt. ent. Z.
Year: 1926
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 69
Part: (1)
Ref Id: 4858.0
Status: Available name
Subfamily: Heliconiinae
Subtribe: Argynnina
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Tribe: Argynnini
Volume: 1926
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des: by original designation
Type Sp Author: Linnaeus
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/10277#page/502/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Systema Naturae
Type Sp Page: 481
Type Sp Series: (Edn 10)
Type Sp Volume: 1
Type Sp Year: 1758
Type Sp Ref Id: 3527.0
Type Sp Genus: Papilio
Type Sp: aglaja
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=MESOACIDALIA', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymphalidae']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- The name Papilio aglaja was given by Linnaeus in 1758 to two different species, once (: 481) to the present Nymphalid (Argynnid) species and once (: 465) to a Pierid (Delias) species. In 1767 (loc. cit. (ed. 12) 1 (2) : 755) he realized the mistake which he had made in 1758, and, in order to correct it, introduced the substitute name Papilio pasilhoe [sic, see below] for the name Papilio aglaja, as previously applied by him to the Pierid species, while retaining the name Papilio aglaja for the present Nymphalid species. In spite of this, the specific name aglaja continued in use for well over one hundred and fifty years both for the Nymphalid and for the Pierid species. That this should have happened was no doubt partly due to the fact that (as already noted) the two species concerned belong to widely separated families but it is certainly due principally to the fact that these species occur in different zoo-geographical regions - the Nymphalid in the Palaearctic Region, the Pierid in the Indo-Oriental Region - with the result that it seldom, if ever, happened that a later author found it necessary to deal with both species in a single work. Indeed, it was not until 1935 (Entomologist 68 : 189 nova) that Verity drew attention to the condition of homonymy between these names, expressed the view that of these two names it was the present (Nymphalid) name that should be rejected as invalid (principle of page precedence) and added that under the Code the name aglaja Linnaeus ought to be replaced by the name charlotta Haworth (Papilio charlotta Haworth, 1802, Prodr. Lep. brit. : 3) ; Verity did not however actually make this change. There then appearing to be no alternative, the change was actually made by myself in 1942 (Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 11 : 158). The situation was however completely changed by the introduction into the current revised Code of 1961 of the First Reviser principle for dealing with cases of this kind (Article 24 (a)). In the present case Linnaeus himself was the First Reviser when (as already noted) he rejected and replaced the name Papilio aglaja as applied to the Pierid species and retained that name for the present Nymphalid species. Thus, under the Code the name Papilio aglaja Linnaeus, 1758 (: 481)is the correct name for the type-species of the present (Nymphalid) species. (Cowan (1968: 13) stated:- MESOACIDALIA, line 6; "pasilhoe" should read; pasithoe The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008).

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c