Teinopalpus
| Number: | 28559.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Author: | Hope | |
| Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/13698#page/142/mode/2up | |
| Family: | Papilionidae | |
| Genus: | Teinopalpus | |
| Journal: | Trans. linn. Soc. Lond. | |
| Year: | 1843 | |
| Homonym Count: | 1.0 | |
| Page: | 131 | |
| Part: | (2) | |
| Ref Id: | 2788.0 | |
| Status: | Available name | |
| Subfamily: | Papilioninae | |
| Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
| Tribe: | Teinopalpini | |
| Volume: | 19 | |
| Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
| Type Des Ref Id: | 5223.0 | |
| Type Des: | by subsequent designation by | |
| Type Des Author: | Scudder | |
| Type Des Year: | 1875 | |
| Type Des Journal: | Proc. amer. acad. Arts Sci., Boston | |
| Type Des Title: | Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Boston | |
| Type Des Volume: | 10 | |
| Type Des Part: | (2) | |
| Type Des Page: | 276 | |
| Type Des Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/22173#page/284/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp Author: | Hope | |
| Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/13698#page/142/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp Journal: | Trans. linn. Soc. Lond. | |
| Type Sp Page: | 131, pl.11, figs 1-2 | |
| Type Sp Volume: | 19 | |
| Type Sp Year: | 1843 | |
| Type Sp Ref Id: | 2788.0 | |
| Type Sp Genus: | Teinopalpus | |
| Type Sp: | imperialis | |
| Memo Links: | ['http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=TEINOPALPUS', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papilionidae'] | |
| Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- Hope regarded this genus as containing two nominal species both then described as new; the first was the above species, the second, Teinopalpus parryae (loc. cit. 19 (2) : 131, pl. II, figs 3, 4 - female). In 1846 (Gen. diurn. Lep. (1) : 2) Doubleday pointed out that these names represent the different sexes of the same species, imperialis being based on the male and parryae upon the female. These names, having been published on the same date in the same work, depend for their relative precedence on the choice of the First Reviser ; this choice was made in the above work by Doubleday when he gave precedence to the name imperialis Hope over the name parryae Hope. Scudder erroneously supposed that Teinopalpus imperialis was the sole originally included nominal species of Teinopalpus and therefore the type-species by monotypy. This misconception of Scudder's does not however detract from the effectiveness of his action. TEINOPALPUS was included within the subfamily PAPILIONIDAE: PAPILIONINAE by Ackery et al., in Kristensen (1999). The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/28526/1677508006952
Retrieved: 17 Sep 2024 00:54:20 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/28526
Retrieved: 17 Sep 2024 00:54:20 (UTC)
Additional Information
| Format | unknown |
|---|---|
| License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
| Dataset | buttmoth |
| Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
| Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
| Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |