Cosmodesmus
| Number: | 7196.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Author: | Haase | |
| Family: | Papilionidae | |
| Genus: | Cosmodesmus | |
| Journal: | Bibl. zool. | |
| Year: | 1891 | |
| Homonym Count: | 1.0 | |
| Page: | 15 | |
| Part: | (8)(1)(1) | |
| Ref Id: | 2297.0 | |
| Status: | Junior objective synonym | |
| Subfamily: | Papilioninae | |
| Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
| Tribe: | Leptocircini | |
| Volume: | 3 | |
| Senior Syn: | PROTESILAUS | |
| Senior Syn Author: | Swainson | |
| Senior Syn Page: | pl.93 | |
| Senior Syn Year: | 1832 | |
| Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
| Type Des Ref Id: | 2553.0 | |
| Type Des: | by subsequent designation by | |
| Type Des Author: | Hemming | |
| Type Des Year: | 1964 | |
| Type Des Journal: | Annot. lep. | |
| Type Des Title: | Annotationes lepidopterologicae / Hepburn and Sons, London | |
| Type Des Part: | (4) | |
| Type Des Page: | 135 | |
| Type Sp Author: | Linnaeus | |
| Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/10277#page/484/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp Journal: | Systema Naturae | |
| Type Sp Page: | 463 | |
| Type Sp Series: | (Edn 10) | |
| Type Sp Volume: | 1 | |
| Type Sp Year: | 1758 | |
| Type Sp Ref Id: | 3527.0 | |
| Type Sp Genus: | Papilio | |
| Type Sp: | protesilaus | |
| Memo Links: | ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=COSMODESMUS', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papilionidae'] | |
| Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- Commenting on this name, Kirby in 1896 (in Allen's Nat. Libr., Lepid. 2 : 272) stated:- "We may perhaps restrict this name, used by Haase with a very wide extension, to the following species (protesilaus Linn.) and its allies." Formerly, I looked upon this as constituting the selection of the above species as the type-species of this genus, but later I took the view that, although Kirby certainly intended that this species should be regarded as typifying Cosmodesmus, the words quoted here - and, in particular, the use of the word "perhaps" - fall short of a definite type-selection. Accordingly, in order to dispel any doubts on this subject, I myself in 1964 selected Papilio protesilaus as type-species. The name Cosmodesmus Haase, so defined, is invalid, as it is a junior objective synonym of the name Protesilaus Swainson, 1832. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/7185/1677508006952
Retrieved: 09 Sep 2024 10:38:34 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/7185
Retrieved: 09 Sep 2024 10:38:34 (UTC)
Additional Information
| Format | unknown |
|---|---|
| License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
| Dataset | buttmoth |
| Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
| Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
| Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |