Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Ypsipetes

Number: 30823.0
Author: Stephens
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/110543#page/54/mode/2up
Family: Geometridae
Genus: Ypsipetes
Journal: Nom. Br. Ins.
Year: 1829
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 44
Ref Id: 11265.0
Status: Junior objective synonym
Subfamily: Larentiinae
Superfamily: Geometroidea
Senior Syn: HYDRIOMENA
Senior Syn Author: Hübner
Senior Syn Page: 322
Senior Syn Year: 1825
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des Ref Id: 9781.0
Type Des: by subsequent designation by
Type Des Author: Guenée
Type Des Year: 1857
Type Des In: in
Type Des In Author: Boisduval & Guenée
Type Des Journal: Hist. nat. Ins.
Type Des Title: Histoire naturelle des insectes
Type Des Series: (Spec. gén. Lépid.)
Type Des Volume: 10
Type Des Page: 378
Type Des Comment: (but designated as elutata Albin, an incorrect authorship)
Type Sp Author: Hübner
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/89253#page/88/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Samml. eur. Schmett.
Type Sp Page: pl.43, fig.224
Type Sp Volume: 5
Type Sp Year: 1799
Type Sp Ref Id: 7550.0
Type Sp Genus: Geometra
Type Sp: elutata
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=YPSIPETES', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometridae']
Memo: Fletcher (1979) stated:- A junior objective synonym of Hydriomena Hübner, [1825]. Invalid designation of type-species: Geometra elutata Hübner, [1799], was designated by Boisduval, 1836, Hist. nat. Insectes. (Spec. gén. Lépid.) 1: 147. In the Introduction to the volume, pages 1-154, Boisduval reviewed earlier classifications of Lepidoptera and designated as many as four different type-species for each genera name. In his `Exposé de notre méthode', pages 155-690, no type-species designation was made for any of the genera that he himself used. Under Article 69(a)(iii) of the Code, the type-designation of an author is eligible for consideration if he states that it is the type `...and if it is clear that he himself accepts it as the type-species', Boisduval's type-designations, although clearly stated, do not fulfil the last requirement and so are invalid. Even though Boisduval's 1836 work was well known to lepidopterists, the type-species designation contained in it have not been accepted, either by Hemming or by other authors. The acceptance of Boisduval's type-species designation in this case would make no difference to the generic concept. See: HYDRIOMENA Hübner, [1825] 1816. Parsons et al. (1999) included HYPSIPETES Agassiz, 1847; HYPSIPETES Swinhoe, 1831; KARACIDARIA Matsumura, 1925; PHAESYLE Bruand, 1847; RHODOMENA Warren, 1904; and YPSIPETES Stephens, 1829 as junior synonyms of HYDRIOMENA Hübner, 1825.

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c