Amphiselenis
| Number: | 1329.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| In Author: | Staudinger & Schatz | |
| Author: | Staudinger | |
| Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/123838#page/266/mode/2up | |
| Family: | Riodinidae | |
| Genus: | Amphiselenis | |
| Journal: | Exot. Schmett. | |
| Year: | 1888 | |
| Homonym Count: | 2.0 | |
| Page: | 257 | |
| Part: | (20) | |
| Ref Id: | 5500.0 | |
| Status: | Available name | |
| Subfamily: | Riodininae | |
| Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
| Tribe: | Riodinini | |
| Volume: | Theil 1 (Band 1) | |
| Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
| Type Des: | by monotypy | |
| Type Sp Author: | Staudinger | |
| Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/123838#page/527/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp In Author: | Staudinger & Schatz | |
| Type Sp Journal: | Exot. Schmett. | |
| Type Sp Page: | pl.91 | |
| Type Sp Part: | (19) | |
| Type Sp Year: | 1887 | |
| Type Sp Ref Id: | 5497.0 | |
| Type Sp Genus: | Lasaia | |
| Type Sp: | chama | |
| Memo Links: | ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=AMPHISELENIS', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Amphiselenis_a.htm', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riodinidae'] | |
| Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- It will be observed that in the text published six months after the plate (pl. 91) on which the new species Lasaia chama had been figured, Staudinger had changed his mind as to the generic affinities of that species and had decided to remove it from the genus Lasaia Bates, in which it had been placed when it was first figured, and to place it in a new genus. He explained that Dr. Hahnel, from whom he had received the type material, had suggested that this species should be removed from Lasaia Bates and placed in a new genus for which he had proposed the name Amphiselenis in manuscript. Staudinger, as shown above, thereupon published the name Amphiselenis, but he appears not to have been completely convinced as to its necessity. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). See images at Butterflies of America. |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/1327/1677508006952
Retrieved: 27 Jun 2024 11:15:37 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/1327
Retrieved: 27 Jun 2024 11:15:37 (UTC)
Additional Information
| Format | unknown |
|---|---|
| License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
| Dataset | buttmoth |
| Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
| Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
| Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |