Heurema
| Number: | 13541.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Author: | Herrich-Schäffer | |
| Family: | Pieridae | |
| Genus: | Heurema | |
| Journal: | Corresp.-Bl. zool.-min. Ver. Regensburg | |
| Year: | 1865 | |
| Homonym Count: | 3.0 | |
| Of Value: | ; | |
| Page: | 89 | |
| Part: | (6) | |
| Ref Id: | 9968.0 | |
| Status: | Junior homonym | |
| Subfamily: | Coliadinae | |
| Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
| Volume: | 19 | |
| Senior Syn: | LEUCIDIA | |
| Senior Syn Author: | Doubleday | |
| Senior Syn Page: | 77 | |
| Senior Syn Year: | 1847 | |
| Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
| Type Des: | by monotypy | |
| Type Sp Author: | van Vollenhoven | |
| Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/35194#page/84/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp Journal: | Essai Faun. ent. Archipel Indo-Néderland., Monogr. | |
| Type Sp Of: | ; | |
| Type Sp Page: | 70, pl.7, fig.5 | |
| Type Sp Part: | (Pierid.) | |
| Type Sp Year: | 1865 | |
| Type Sp Ref Id: | 8423.0 | |
| Type Sp Genus: | Terias | |
| Type Sp: | impura | |
| Memo Links: | ['http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=HEUREMA', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pieridae'] | |
| Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- (repaged offprint as Prodomus ... 1 : 71). This alleged name owes its origin to a misunderstanding on the part of Herrich-Schäffer, by whom it was attributed to Agassiz and used for the same species as Doubleday in 1844 had placed in his then new genus Eurema (a genus of the family Nymphalidae). The mistake made by Herrich-Schäffer was in thinking that Agassiz had introduced the name Heurema as an emendation of the Nymphalid genus Eurema Doubleday, 1844 ; what in fact that author had done was to introduce the name Heurema as an emendation of the Pierid genus Eurema Hübner, [1819]. Herrich-Schäffer would never have introduced the name Heurema, if it had not been for this misreading of the action of Agassiz; in this sense therefore there is, properly speaking, no such genus as Heurema Herrich-Schäffer. If that author had deliberately introduced the name Heurema, it would have been a junior objective synonym of Eurema Doubleday, and as pointed out by myself in 1939 (Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 8 : 134) the genus so established would have had as its type-species Papilio lethe Fabricius, 1793 (Ent. syst 3 (1) : 80), that being the type-species of Eurema Doubleday. Cowan (1970: 14) stated:- "1846 to read [1847]", [genus year]. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/13527/1677508006952
Retrieved: 22 Dec 2024 09:19:58 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/13527
Retrieved: 22 Dec 2024 09:19:58 (UTC)
Additional Information
| Format | unknown |
|---|---|
| License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
| Dataset | buttmoth |
| Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
| Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
| Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |