Incisalia
| Number: | 14644.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Author: | Scudder | |
| Family: | Lycaenidae | |
| Genus: | Incisalia | |
| Journal: | Rep. Peabody Acad. Sci. | |
| Year: | 1872 | |
| Homonym Count: | 1.0 | |
| Page: | 31 | |
| Ref Id: | 11138.0 | |
| Status: | Available name | |
| Subfamily: | Theclinae | |
| Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
| Tribe: | Eumaeini | |
| Volume: | 4 | |
| Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
| Type Des: | by original designation | |
| Type Sp Author: | Hübner | |
| Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/103196#page/82/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp Journal: | Verz. bekannt. Schmett. | |
| Type Sp Page: | 74, Zutr. s. Samml. exot. Schm. 2 pl.[36], figs, 203, 204 | |
| Type Sp Part: | (5) | |
| Type Sp Year: | 1819 | |
| Type Sp Ref Id: | 2846.0 | |
| Type Sp Genus: | Lycus | |
| Type Sp: | niphon | |
| Memo Links: | ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=INCISALIA', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycaenidae'] | |
| Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- This name has sometimes been attributed to Minot. This is due, no doubt to the fact that, as stated by Scudder, it was first proposed by Minot in manuscript. Cowan (1970: 49) stated:- INCISALIA type-species to read - Lyons niphon Hübner, [1819], Verz. bek. Schm. (5) : 74, Zutr. s. Samml. exot. Schm. 2 : pl. [36], figs. 203, 204. Hübner's Verzeichniss listed "Lycus niphon, Zuträge 203, 204." As plate [36] of the Zuträge also appeared in [1819], with the unnamed figures 203, 204, the two works mutually validated the binomen Lyons Siphon (see further discussion in List E above, under LICUS). The text referring to the plate, Zuträge 2 : 7, did not itself appear until [1823]. [This replaces the type-species - Licus niphon Hübner, [1823], Zutr. z. Samml. exot. Schmett. 2 : 7, pl. [36], figs 203, 204, (given in Hemming 1967, p.231)]. This name has sometimes been attributed to Minot. This is due, no doubt, to the fact that, as stated by Scudder, it was first proposed by Minot in manuscript, [in Hemming, 1967, p.231.]] The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/14629/1677508006952
Retrieved: 13 Jun 2025 15:41:12 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/14629
Retrieved: 13 Jun 2025 15:41:12 (UTC)
Additional Information
| Format | unknown |
|---|---|
| License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
| Dataset | buttmoth |
| Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
| Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
| Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |