Ithomeis
Number: | 14916.0 | |
---|---|---|
Author: | Bates | |
Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/86346#page/608/mode/2up | |
Family: | Riodinidae | |
Genus: | Ithomeis | |
Journal: | Trans. linn. Soc. Lond. | |
Year: | 1862 | |
Homonym Count: | 1.0 | |
Page: | 541, note | |
Part: | (3) | |
Ref Id: | 291.0 | |
Status: | Available name | |
Subfamily: | Riodininae | |
Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
Tribe: | Riodinini | |
Volume: | 23 | |
Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
Type Des Ref Id: | 5223.0 | |
Type Des: | by subsequent designation by | |
Type Des Author: | Scudder | |
Type Des Year: | 1875 | |
Type Des Journal: | Proc. amer. acad. Arts Sci., Boston | |
Type Des Title: | Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Boston | |
Type Des Volume: | 10 | |
Type Des Part: | (2) | |
Type Des Page: | 198 | |
Type Des Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/22173#page/206/mode/2up | |
Type Sp Author: | Bates | |
Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/86346#page/608/mode/2up | |
Type Sp Journal: | Trans. linn. Soc. Lond. | |
Type Sp Page: | 541, note | |
Type Sp Volume: | 23 | |
Type Sp Year: | 1862 | |
Type Sp Ref Id: | 291.0 | |
Type Sp Genus: | Ithomeis | |
Type Sp: | aurantiaca | |
Memo Links: | ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=ITHOMEIS', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Ithomeis_a.htm', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riodinidae'] | |
Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- The exact date of publication in 1862 of the name Ithomeis Bates is of importance because there is a name Ithomiopsis Felder (C.) & Felder (R.) which was also published in 1862 and which is currently treated as a subjective synonym of Ithomeis Bates. Fortunately, information on this subject is provided in a note published by Bates in 1868 (J. linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 9 : 430), in which he recorded that the name Ithomeis was published in September 1862 and Ithomiopsis in December of that year. The name Ithomeis Bates has therefore clear priority over the name Ithomiopsis Felder & Felder. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). See images at Butterflies of America. |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/14900/1677508006952
Retrieved: 12 Jun 2025 18:46:13 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/14900
Retrieved: 12 Jun 2025 18:46:13 (UTC)
Additional Information
Format | unknown |
---|---|
License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
Dataset | buttmoth |
Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |