Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Leptoptera

Number: 15834.0
Author: Scudder
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/22173#page/212/mode/2up
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Leptoptera
Journal: Proc. amer. acad. Arts Sci., Boston
Year: 1875
Homonym Count: 2.0
Page: 204
Part: (2)
Ref Id: 5223.0
Status: Junior objective synonym
Subfamily: Biblidinae
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Tribe: Pseudergolini
Volume: 10
Senior Syn: AMNOSIA
Senior Syn Author: Doubleday
Senior Syn Page: pl.51, fig. 4
Senior Syn Year: 1849
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des: by original designation
Type Sp Author: Doubleday
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/49324#page/330/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Gen. diurn. Lep.
Type Sp Page: pl.51, fig.4
Type Sp Page Comment: [text published by Westwood in [July 1850], in Doubleday, Gen. diurn. Lep. (2) : 260].
Type Sp Year: 1849
Type Sp Ref Id: 1482.0
Type Sp Genus: Amnosia
Type Sp: decora
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=LEPTOPTERA', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymphalidae']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- This name has had an unsatisfactory and confusing history, as the result entirely of Boisduval's habit of putting manuscript names into an irregular circulation and of failing later to provide those names with a definite nomenclatorial status. The history of the present case is as follows. The name Leptoptera first appeared in print in 1842 (Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. II (4) : 298) in a casual reference by Lucas in the paper in which he established the genus Godartia. Lucas provided no diagnosis to the then-unpublished genus Leptoptera, merely stating that its type-species was "decora Boisduval (inedit.)". Both the name Leptoptera and the specific name decora failed to acquire any status in nomenclature in Lucas's paper, since neither was then provided with a description or other indication. The next occasion when either of these names appeared in print was in 1844 (List Spec. lep. Ins. Brit. Mus. 1 : 88), when Doubleday published the specific name decora in the combination Amnosia decora, which he attributed again to Boisduval. So published, this name appeared in a bare list of names and accordingly remained a nomen nudum ; the generic name Amnosia, which here made its first appearance in the literature, was also a nomen nudum, being published without any description or indication and without any duly established nominal species. It was not until 1849 that the nominal species Amnosia decora was validly established, it being figured by Doubleday in the Gen. diurn. Lep. in that year. The name Leptoptera did not appear in the literature after 1842 until it was published by Scudder in 1875 with Amnosia decora Doubleday as type-species. Scudder erroneously accepted Lucas as having validly published this manuscript name of Boisduval's ; as he was the first author to accept this name as validly published, he must himself be treated as its author as of 1875. This is of no practical importance, for, as he pointed out, the designation of Amnosia decora Doubleday as type-species makes Leptoptera a junior objective synonym of Amnosia Doubleday, [1849]. Cowan (1970: 50) stated:- "delete - (sine descr.)", [type-species page - end]. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008).

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c