Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Lita

Number: 16214.0
In Author: Ochsenheimer
Author: Treitschke
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/107177#page/82/mode/2up
Family: Gelechiidae
Genus: Lita
Journal: Schmett. Eur.
Year: 1833
Homonym Count: 3.0
Page: 76
Part: (2)
Ref Id: 5850.0
Status: Junior homonym
Subfamily: Subfamily unassigned
Superfamily: Gelechioidea
Volume: 9
Senior Syn: PROLITA
Senior Syn Author: Leraut
Senior Syn Page: 182
Senior Syn Year: 1993
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des Ref Id: 8761.0
Type Des: by subsequent designation by
Type Des Author: Duponchel
Type Des Year: 1838
Type Des Journal: Hist. nat. Lépid. Papillons Fr.
Type Des Title: Histoire Naturelle des Lépidoptères, ou Papillons de France
Type Des Volume: 11
Type Des Page: 19
Type Des Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/38066#page/24/mode/2up
Type Sp Author: Treitschke
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/107177#page/88/mode/2up
Type Sp In Author: Ochsenheimer
Type Sp Journal: Schmett. Eur.
Type Sp Page: 82
Type Sp Part: (2)
Type Sp Volume: 9
Type Sp Year: 1833
Type Sp Ref Id: 5850.0
Type Sp Genus: Lita
Type Sp: zebrella
Memo Links: ['http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gelechiidae', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=LITA']
Memo: Nye & Fletcher (1991) stated:- A junior homonym of Lita Kollar, 1832, Beitr. Landeskde Oesterr. Enns 2: 95, - Lepid., Gelechiidae. There is no objective replacement name. Lita was made nomenclaturally available by Kollar prior to its proposal and generic description by Treitschke. The citation by Duponchel is acceptable as a type-species designation as it is contained in the continuation of a layout in which Duponchel stated in the same work, 7 (2): 102, that the species so cited were the type of genera. Unavailable designation of type-species: Phalaena vittella Linnaeus, 1758, was designated by Boisduval, 1836, Hist. nat. Linnaeus, 1758, was designated by Boisduval, 1836, Hist. nat. Insectes (Spec. gén. Lépid.): 138. In the Introduction to the volume, pages 1-154, Boisduval reviewed earlier classifications of Lepidoptera and designated as many as three different type-species for each generic name. In his "Exposé de notre Méthode", pages 155-690, no type-species designation was made for any of the genera he hinself used. Under the Code (Edn 3), Article 69(a)(iv), the type-species designation of an author is eligible for consideration if he states that it is the type".. and if it is clear that the author accepts it as the type-species". Boisdival's type designation, although clearly stated, do not fufill the last requirement and so are unavailable. Even though Boisduval's 1836 work was well known to lepidopterists, the type-designation contained in a have not been accepted by Hemming or by other authors. Prolita is the objective replacement name for the preoccuppied name Lita Treitschke, 1833, nec Kollar, 1832 by Leraut 1993, Alexanor 18 (3) : 182.

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c