Lophopteryx
| Number: | 16428.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Author: | Stephens | |
| Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/37014#page/500/mode/2up | |
| Family: | Notodontidae | |
| Genus: | Lophopteryx | |
| Journal: | Syst. Cat. Br. Insects | |
| Year: | 1829 | |
| Homonym Count: | 3.0 | |
| Page: | 43 | |
| Part: | (Insecta Haustellata) | |
| Ref Id: | 5553.0 | |
| Status: | Junior homonym & objective synonym | |
| Subfamily: | Subfamily unassigned | |
| Superfamily: | Noctuoidea | |
| Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
| Type Des Ref Id: | 6444.0 | |
| Type Des: | by subsequent designation by | |
| Type Des Author: | Westwood | |
| Type Des Year: | 1840 | |
| Type Des Journal: | Introd. mod. Classif. Insects | |
| Type Des Title: | An introduction to the modern classification of insects; founded on the natural habits and corresponding organisation of the different families / by J. O. Westwood | |
| Type Des Volume: | 2 | |
| Type Des Part: | (Synopsis Genera Br. Insects) | |
| Type Des Page: | 90 | |
| Type Des Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/45812#page/696/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp Author: | Linnaeus | |
| Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/10277#page/528/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp Journal: | Systema Naturae | |
| Type Sp Page: | 507 | |
| Type Sp Series: | (Edn 10) | |
| Type Sp Volume: | 1 | |
| Type Sp Year: | 1758 | |
| Type Sp Ref Id: | 3527.0 | |
| Type Sp Genus: | Phalaena | |
| Type Sp: | camelina | |
| Memo Links: | ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=LOPHOPTERYX', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notodontidae'] | |
| Memo: | Watson, Fletcher & Nye (1980) stated:- A junior objective synonym of Ptilodon Hübner, 1822 [a rejected name]. Invalid type-species designation: Phalaena camelina Linnaeus, 1758, was designated by Boisduval, 1836, Hist. nat. Insectes (Spec. gén. Lepid.) 1: 142. In the introduction to the volume, pages 1-154, Boisduval reviewed earlier classifications of Lepidoptera and designated as many as three different type-species for each generic name. In his `Exposé de notre méthode', pages 155-690, no type-species designation was made for any of the genera that he himself used. Under the Code, Article 69(a)(iii), the type-species designation of an author is eligible for consideration if he states that it is the type `... and if it is clear that he himself accepts as the type-species'. Boisduval's type-designations, although clearly stated, do not fulfil the last requirement and so are invalid. Even though Boisduval's 1836 work was well known to lepidopterists, the type-designations contained in it have not been accepted, either by Hemming or by other authors. The acceptance of Boisduval's type-species designation in the case of Lophopteryx would make no difference to the generic concept. Lophopteryx was again proposed by Stephens, 1829 [June], Nom. Br. Insects: 39; and 1829 [July], Syst. Cat. Br. Insects (2): 43. |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/16410/1677508006952
Retrieved: 28 Jul 2025 19:14:09 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/16410
Retrieved: 28 Jul 2025 19:14:09 (UTC)
Additional Information
| Format | unknown |
|---|---|
| License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
| Dataset | buttmoth |
| Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
| Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
| Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |