Achlyodes
Number: | 177.0 | |
---|---|---|
Author: | Hübner | |
Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/103196#page/116/mode/2up | |
Family: | Hesperiidae | |
Genus: | Achlyodes | |
Journal: | Verz. bekannt. Schmett. | |
Year: | 1819 | |
Homonym Count: | 1.0 | |
Page: | 108 | |
Ref Id: | 2846.0 | |
Status: | Available name | |
Subfamily: | Pyrginae | |
Superfamily: | Hesperioidea | |
Tribe: | Pyrgini | |
Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
Type Des Ref Id: | 8757.0 | |
Type Des: | by subsequent designation by | |
Type Des Author: | Butler | |
Type Des Year: | 1870 | |
Type Des Journal: | Ent. mon. Mag. | |
Type Des Title: | Entomologists Monthly Magazine | |
Type Des Volume: | 7 | |
Type Des Part: | (76) | |
Type Des Page: | 98 | |
Type Des Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/102841#page/132/mode/2up | |
Type Sp Author: | Cramer | |
Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/95037#page/264/mode/2up | |
Type Sp Journal: | Uitl. Kapellen | |
Type Sp Page: | 119, pl.261, figs A-C | |
Type Sp Volume: | 3 | |
Type Sp Year: | 1779 | |
Type Sp Ref Id: | 6914.0 | |
Type Sp Genus: | Papilio | |
Type Sp: | busirus | |
Memo Links: | ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=ACHLYODES', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesperiidae', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039'] | |
Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- In accordance with the then fashionable `Principle of Elimination' Scudder (1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 100) considered that Papilio busirus was ineligible to be the type-species of this genus, and thereupon sought to make Achlyodes fridericus Hübner, [1819] (Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (7) : 108) type-species in its stead. There was no justification for rejecting the selection of Papilio busirus as type-species, which is perfectly valid. Moreover, even if at that time Achlyodes had been without a validly selected type-species, Scudder's selection of Achlyodes fridericus would have been invalid, for when its name appeared in the Verzeichniss this was only a manuscript species, the name fridericus being then only a nomen nudum. The species concerned remained without a validly published name until in 1832 (in Hübner, Zutr. z. Samml. exot. Schmett. 4 : 9, pl. [106], figs 611, 612) Geyer validated Hübner's manuscript name, using it in the same combination (Achlyodes fridericus). The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/176/1677508006952
Retrieved: 24 Jul 2025 07:58:45 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/176
Retrieved: 24 Jul 2025 07:58:45 (UTC)
Additional Information
Format | unknown |
---|---|
License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
Dataset | buttmoth |
Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |