Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Achlyodes

Number: 177.0
Author: Hübner
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/103196#page/116/mode/2up
Family: Hesperiidae
Genus: Achlyodes
Journal: Verz. bekannt. Schmett.
Year: 1819
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 108
Ref Id: 2846.0
Status: Available name
Subfamily: Pyrginae
Superfamily: Hesperioidea
Tribe: Pyrgini
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des Ref Id: 8757.0
Type Des: by subsequent designation by
Type Des Author: Butler
Type Des Year: 1870
Type Des Journal: Ent. mon. Mag.
Type Des Title: Entomologists Monthly Magazine
Type Des Volume: 7
Type Des Part: (76)
Type Des Page: 98
Type Des Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/102841#page/132/mode/2up
Type Sp Author: Cramer
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/95037#page/264/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Uitl. Kapellen
Type Sp Page: 119, pl.261, figs A-C
Type Sp Volume: 3
Type Sp Year: 1779
Type Sp Ref Id: 6914.0
Type Sp Genus: Papilio
Type Sp: busirus
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=ACHLYODES', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesperiidae', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- In accordance with the then fashionable `Principle of Elimination' Scudder (1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 100) considered that Papilio busirus was ineligible to be the type-species of this genus, and thereupon sought to make Achlyodes fridericus Hübner, [1819] (Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (7) : 108) type-species in its stead. There was no justification for rejecting the selection of Papilio busirus as type-species, which is perfectly valid. Moreover, even if at that time Achlyodes had been without a validly selected type-species, Scudder's selection of Achlyodes fridericus would have been invalid, for when its name appeared in the Verzeichniss this was only a manuscript species, the name fridericus being then only a nomen nudum. The species concerned remained without a validly published name until in 1832 (in Hübner, Zutr. z. Samml. exot. Schmett. 4 : 9, pl. [106], figs 611, 612) Geyer validated Hübner's manuscript name, using it in the same combination (Achlyodes fridericus). The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008).

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c