Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Parnassis

Number: 21916.0
Author: Hübner
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/103196#page/98/mode/2up
Family: Papilionidae
Genus: Parnassis
Journal: Verz. bekannt. Schmett.
Year: 1819
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 90
Ref Id: 2846.0
Status: Junior objective synonym
Subfamily: Parnassiinae
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Tribe: Parnassiini
Senior Syn: PARNASSIUS
Senior Syn Author: Latreille
Senior Syn Page: 185, 199
Senior Syn Year: 1804
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des Ref Id: 2550.0
Type Des: by subsequent designation by
Type Des Author: Hemming
Type Des Year: 1939
Type Des Journal: Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond.
Type Des Title: Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London
Type Des Series: (B)
Type Des Volume: 8
Type Des Part: (7)
Type Des Page: 136
Type Sp Author: Linnaeus
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/10277#page/486/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Systema Naturae
Type Sp Page: 465
Type Sp Series: (Edn 10)
Type Sp Volume: 1
Type Sp Year: 1758
Type Sp Ref Id: 3527.0
Type Sp Genus: Papilio
Type Sp: apollo
Memo Links: ['http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papilionidae', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=PARNASSIS']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- The present is one of those cases on which the fact that Hübner never attributed authors' names to names which he employed, and never indicated which of the names in his books were new names of his own, makes it difficult to interpret his action with confidence. If he had given an indication in either of the above senses, it would have been easy to determine whether the name Parnassis as used in the Verzeichniss was there put forward as a new name or whether it was no more than an emendation of the name Parnassius Latreille, 1804. Hübner in his works did not show any close acquaintance with Latreille's writings, and it seems likely that he had not seen the volume of the Nouv. Dict. Hist. nat. in which the name Parnassius Latreille was published, and that in using the name Parnassis in the same sense as that in which Latreille had used the name Parnassius, he was relying upon some information which he had received at second hand and was perhaps not sure whether the name Parnassius had even been actually published at that time ; this possibility is strengthened by the difference in the spelling which he employed, that difference being readily understandable if he thought that he was dealing only with a manuscript name. From a practical point of view this is not a matter of importance, for Hübner's Parnassius would have been invalid as a junior objective synonym of Parnassius Latreille, irrespective of whether Hübner put it forward as a new name or whether he looked upon it as an Emendation of Parnassius Latreille. In the complete absence of any indication by Hübner as to his view on this subject, it seems best to treat Parnassis as an objectively invalid name put forward by Hübner himself, and that interpretation is accordingly here adopted. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008).

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c