Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Ptychopteryx

Number: 25132.0
Author: Wallengren
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/106909#page/128/mode/2up
Family: Pieridae
Genus: Ptychopteryx
Journal: K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl.
Year: 1857
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 17
Part: (4)
Ref Id: 6222.0
Series: (n.f.)
Status: Junior homonym
Subfamily: Pierinae
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Tribe: Tribe unassigned
Volume: 2
Senior Syn: THESPIA
Senior Syn Author: Wallengren
Senior Syn Page: 77
Senior Syn Year: 1858
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des: by monotypy
Type Sp Author: Wallengren
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/106909#page/130/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl.
Type Sp Page: 18
Type Sp Part: (4)
Type Sp Series: (2)
Type Sp Year: 1857
Type Sp Ref Id: 6222.0
Type Sp Genus: Ptychopteryx
Type Sp: bohemani
Memo Links: ['http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=PTYCHOPTERYX', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pieridae']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- The taxon represented by the nominal species Ptychopteryx bohemani Wallengren is currently treated subjectively on taxonomic grounds as being the same as that represented by the older-established nominal species Teracolus subfasciatus Swainson, [1833] (Zool. Illustr. (2) 3 : pl. 115). The name Ptychopteryx Wallengren is invalid, as being a junior homonym of Ptychopteryx Leach, 1817 (in Brewster's Edinb. Ency. 12 (1) : 155). Cowan (1970: 22) stated:- Some surprise is evinced that Wallengren "twice described as new" several genera (e.g. Anthopsyche, Chrysorychia), first in the Nandlingar of 1857 and then in the Ofversigt in 1858. But that was a normal procedure, the Ofversigt (over-sight; review) standing in relation to the Handlingar more or less as do Bulletins and Proceedings vis-a-vis Annals and Transactions. Papers for the Handlingar were printed as they came, and published individually paginated. That is why Wallengren's paper No. 4 is correctly dated "1857" although Part (1) of the Volume (n.f.) 2 was not completed until 1858. Papers were available for purchase direct from the Akademy as soon as printed. They were virtually ready-made "separates." The Ofversigt reviewed the Handlingar material and, which is important, often revised it. Wallengren's paper No. 4 of 1857 had several modifications when reported in 1858 in part (2) (of 9) of Ofversigt 15. The replacement name Thespia appeared in place of the original Ptychopteryx; and type-species were designated for several genera (Chrysorychia, Pseudonympha, Rhopalocampta) for which the Handlingar paper had omitted that service. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008).

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c