Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Sita

Number: 27051.0
Author: Herrich-Schäffer
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Sita
Journal: Corresp.-Bl. zool.-min. Ver. Regensburg
Year: 1864
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 102
Part: (7/8)
Ref Id: 2653.0
Status: Junior homonym
Subfamily: Satyrinae
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Tribe: Zetherini
Volume: 18
Senior Syn: ETHOPE
Senior Syn Author: Moore
Senior Syn Page: 770
Senior Syn Year: 1866
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des Ref Id: 2553.0
Type Des: by subsequent designation by
Type Des Author: Hemming
Type Des Year: 1964
Type Des Journal: Annot. lep.
Type Des Title: Annotationes lepidopterologicae / Hepburn and Sons, London
Type Des Part: (4)
Type Des Page: 120
Type Des Comment: (under Article 69(a) (ii)) (of ETHOPE Moore, 1866, the objective replacement name)
Type Sp Author: Felder & Felder
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/98656#page/412/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Wien. ent. Monatschr.
Type Sp Page: 403
Type Sp Volume: 3
Type Sp Year: 1859
Type Sp Ref Id: 1815.0
Type Sp Genus: Neorina
Type Sp: sita
Memo Links: ['http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymphalidae', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=SITA']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- Herrich-Schaeffer established this genus in a key, placing it between Antirrhaea Hübner (genus 19) and Hipio Hübner (genus 21). No species were cited for any of the genera in the key, this being left for the later treatment of these genera in the main text. The portion of the text relating to the genera cited in this key was published in 1865 (loc. cit. 19 : 71). Here Herrich-Schaeffer omitted all reference to his genus Sita, inserting at the point where it should have appeared the genus Neorina Doubleday [recte Westwood], in which he placed Neorina hilda Westwood (the type-species of Neorina) and Neorina sita. There can be no doubt in the circumstances that, when he established the nominal genus Sita, it was his intention to included in it the species Neorina sita, which would thus have become the type-species by absolute tautonymy. However, in view of the fact that Herrich-Schaeffer made no mention of the name Sita when later he dealt with the genus Neorina, it cannot be claimed that Neorina sita was one of the originally included species of Sita. It has to be admitted in fact that the generic name Sita Herrich-Schaeffer was published without any nominal species being cited as belonging to the genus. In order to provide this generic name with a definite place in the literature I designated Neorina sita as type-species under the provisions of Article 67 (a) (ii). The name Sita Herrich-Schaeffer is invalid, as it is a junior homonym of Sita Semper, 1862 (J. Conch. 10 : 143). The taxon represented by the nominal species Neorina sita is currently treated subjectively on taxonomic grounds as being the same as that represented by the older-established nominal species Mycalesis (?) himachala Moore, 1857 (in Horsfield & Moore, Cat. lep. Ins. Mus. East India Coy (1) : 234, the type-species of Ethope Moore, 1866). The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008).

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c