Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Biblis

Number: 3837.0
In Author: Illiger
Author: Fabricius
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Biblis
Journal: Mag. Insektenk.
Year: 1807
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 281
Ref Id: 1782.0
Series: (Illiger)
Status: Available name
Subfamily: Biblidinae
Subtribe: Biblidina
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Tribe: Biblidini
Volume: 6
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des: (through Article 68.4 (absolute tautonymy))
Type Des Comment: (under Article 68 (d))
Type Sp Author: Fabricius
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/82400#page/522/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Systema entomologiae
Type Sp Page: 505
Type Sp Year: 1775
Type Sp Ref Id: 1777.0
Type Sp Genus: Papilio
Type Sp: biblis
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=BIBLIS', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Biblis_a.htm', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymphalidae']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- Scudder was one of numerous authors who considered that a generic name should be rejected if the word of which it consisted was the same as the specific name of its type-species (Scudder, 1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 127). It was presumably because of Scudder's action that for a long time the name Biblis fell out of use. This genus has been unlucky in the name applied to it, for from 1844 (Doubleday, List. Spec. lep. Ins. Brit. Mus. 1 : 144) onwards for many years the name Didonis Hübner, [1819], was wrongly applied to this genus. This was due no doubt to the fact that Papilio biblis Fabricius was one of the two originally included species in the genus Didonis. No author selected that species to be the type-species of Didonis, and, as shown above, even if any author had done so, the only effect would have been to make Didonis a junior objective synonym of Biblis Fabricius. After 1875 (Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 156) there was no possible justification for the continued use of the name Didonis in this way, for Scudder then selected as the type-species Papilio vitellia Stoll, [1781], the second of the two species placed in this genus by Hübner. This species is not even a Nymphalid, being an Elymniad Satyrid. The name Papilio biblis Fabricius, 1775, for the type-species of this genus is invalid, it being a junior homonym of Papilio biblis Drury, [1773] (Ill. nat. Hist. 1 : index et 9, pl. 4, fig. 2 (2 figs)). It is subjectively considered on taxonomic grounds that the oldest available name applicable to the present species is Papilio hyperia Cramer, [1779] (Uitl. Kapellen 3 (20) : 74, pl. 236, figs E, F). The specific name by which on the foregoing taxonomic view the type-species of Biblis Fabricius should be known is therefore hyperia Cramer. BIBLIS was included within the subfamily NYMPHALIDAE: LIMENITINAE by Ackery et al., in Kristensen (1999). Oppler & Warren, 2003. Butterflies of North America 2. Scientific Names List of Butterfly Species of North America, north of Mexico. Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University include Biblis in the subfamily Biblidinae. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). See images at Butterflies of America.

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c