Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Biston

Number: 3918.0
In Author: Brewster
Author: Leach
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/58397#page/142/mode/2up
Family: Geometridae
Genus: Biston
Journal: Edinburgh Encycl.
Year: 1815
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 134
Ref Id: 3451.0
Status: Available name
Subfamily: Ennominae
Superfamily: Geometroidea
Volume: 9
Type Country: [AUSTRIA]
Type Depository: (? Depository)
Type Locality: Vienna region
Types: Syntype(s)
Type Des Ref Id: 6444.0
Type Des: by subsequent designation by
Type Des Author: Westwood
Type Des Year: 1840
Type Des Journal: Introd. mod. Classif. Insects
Type Des Title: An introduction to the modern classification of insects; founded on the natural habits and corresponding organisation of the different families / by J. O. Westwood
Type Des Volume: 2
Type Des Part: (Synopsis Genera Br. Insects)
Type Des Page: 99
Type Des Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/45812#page/702/mode/2up
Type Sp Author: Schiffermüller
Type Sp Journal: Ankündung syst. Werkes. Schmett. Wienergegend
Type Sp Page: 99
Type Sp Year: 1775
Type Sp Ref Id: 11114.0
Type Sp Genus: Geometra
Type Sp: prodromaria
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=BISTON', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometridae']
Memo: Fletcher (1979) stated:- G. prodromaria is a junior subjective synonym of Phalaena strataria Hufnagel, 1767, Berl. Mag. 4: 514. Invalid designation of type-species: Phalaena betularia Linnaeus, 1758, was designated by Boisduval, 1836, Hist. nat. Insectes (Spec. gén. Lépid.) 1 : 146. In the introduction to the volume, pages 1-154, Boisduval reviewed earlier classifications of Lepidoptera and designated as many as four different type-species for each generic name. In his `Exposé de notre méthode', pages 155-690, no type-species designation was made for any of the genera he himself used. Under Article 69(a)(iii) of the Code the type-designation of an author is eligible for consideration if he states that it is the type `...and if it is clear that he himself accepts it as the type-species'. Boisduval's type-designations, although clearly stated, do not fulfill the last requirement and so are invalid. Even though Boisduval's work was well known to lepidopterists, the type-designations contained in it have not been accepted either by Hemming or by other authors. The acceptance of Boisduval's type-species designation in the case of Biston would make no difference to the generic concept, P. betularia Linnaeus and P. strataria Hufnagel being currently regarded as congeneric. Parsons et al. (1999) included AMPHIDASEA Unger, 1856; AMPHIDASIS Treitschke, 1825; AMPHIDASYS Sodoffsky, 1837; BLEPHAROCTENIA Warren, 1894; BUZURA Walker, 1863; CULCULA Moore, 1888; DASYPHARA Billberg, 1820; EPAMRAICA Matsumura, 1910; EUBYJA Hübner, 1825; EUBYJODONTA Warren, 1893; and PACHYS Hübner, 1822 as junior synonyms of BISTON Leach, 1815.

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c