Due to bot activity, the dataset list is currently only available to internal or logged-in users. If you need access please contact us.

Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Callianira

Number: 4689.0
Author: Hübner
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/103196#page/46/mode/2up
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Callianira
Journal: Verz. bekannt. Schmett.
Year: 1819
Homonym Count: 2.0
Page: 38
Ref Id: 2846.0
Status: Junior homonym
Subfamily: Limenitidinae
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Tribe: Limenitidini
Senior Syn: LIMENITIS
Senior Syn Author: Fabricius
Senior Syn Page: 281
Senior Syn Year: 1807
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des: by monotypy
Type Sp Author: Hübner
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/103196#page/46/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Verz. bekannt. Schmett.
Type Sp Page: 38
Type Sp Page Comment: as defined by the specimen shown as figure 1 on plate 25 of Stoll's Aanhangs. Werk. Uitl. Kapellen Pieter Cramer (published in 179
Type Sp Part: (3)
Type Sp Year: 1819
Type Sp Ref Id: 2846.0
Type Sp Genus: Callianira
Type Sp: ephestiaena
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=CALLIANIRA', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymphalidae']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- Hübner based the name Callianira ephestiaena on two bibliographical references; the first of these was to Papilio ephestion Stoll (referred to above), the second to Najas ephestion Hübner, [1813] (Samml. exot. Schmett 1 : pl. [67]). It is not known whether, when Hübner published the name Najas ephestion, he looked upon himself as establishing a new nominal species or whether the specific name ephestion which he then used was no more than a subsequent usage by him of the name ephestion Stoll. The status of the name Callianira ephestiaena Hübner differs according to which of these hypotheses is adopted. If the name ephestion as used by Hübner was not looked upon by him as a new name, the name Callianira ephestiaena is seen to be a straightforward - though unnecessary - replacement of the name Papilio ephestion Stoll. On this basis the lectotype of Stoll's ephestion is automatically the lectotype also of Callianira ephestiaena. If on the other hand, Hübner looked upon his Najas ephestion as a new name introduced by himself, the nominal species Callianira ephestiaena is seen to have been a new nominal species established on the basis jointly of Papilio ephestion Stoll and Najas ephestion Hübner. In that case Callianira ephestiaena would be without a type-specimen until some author selected a lectotype for it from among syntypes. The situation discussed above was met when in 1964 (in the paper cited at the head of the present note) I selected the specimen shown in figure 1 on plate 25 of Stoll's Aanhangsel to represent the lectotype (a) of Papilio ephestion Stoll (thus providing Callianira ephestiaena with a lectotype on the first of the alternatives outlined above) and (b) of Callianira ephestiaena (thus meeting the situation arising on the second of those alternatives). The taxon represented by the nominal species Callianira ephestiaena Hübner (i.e. the objectively identical Papilio ephestion Stoll) is currently treated subjectively on taxonomic grounds as being the same as that represented by the older-established nominal species Papilio astyanax Fabricius, 1775 (Syst. Ent. : 447). This latter is similarly treated subjectively as a subspecies of the taxon represented by the nominal species Papilio arthemis Drury, [1773] (Ill. nat. Hist. 2 : index et 17, pl. 10, figs 3, 4). The generic name Callianira Hübner is invalid under the Law of Homonymy, as it is junior homonym of Callianira Peron & Lesueur, 1810 (Ann. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris 15 (85) : 65), the name of a genus of Mollusca. Cowan (1968: 11) stated: [CALLIANIRA] line 3: "ephestaena" should read; ephestiaena" [type-species]. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008).

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c