Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Chaonia

Number: 5741.0
Author: Stephens
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/34123#page/42/mode/2up
Family: Notodontidae
Genus: Chaonia
Journal: Illust. Br. Ent.
Year: 1828
Homonym Count: 3.0
Page: 29
Ref Id: 5540.0
Series: (Haustellata)
Status: Available name
Subfamily: Subfamily unassigned
Superfamily: Noctuoidea
Volume: 2
Type Country: GERMANY
Type Depository: (? Depository)
Type Locality: ? Locality
Types: Type(s)
Type Des Ref Id: 7059.0
Type Des: by subsequent designation by
Type Des Author: Duponchel
Type Des Year: 1843
Type Des In: in
Type Des In Author: d'Orbigny
Type Des Journal: Dict. univl Hist. Nat.
Type Des Title: Dictionnaire universel d'Histoire naturelle
Type Des Volume: 3
Type Des Page: 391
Type Des Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/123119#page/400/mode/2up
Type Sp Author: Fabricius
Type Sp Journal: Genera Insect.
Type Sp Page: 283
Type Sp Year: 1777
Type Sp Ref Id: 9548.0
Type Sp Genus: Noctua
Type Sp: roboris
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=CHAONIA', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notodontidae']
Memo: Watson, Fletcher & Nye (1980) stated:- N. roboris is a junior subjective synonym of Bombyx ruficornis Hufnagel, 1766, Berl. Mag. 2:242. Invalid type-species designation: Bombyx dodonaea [Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775, was designated by Boisduval, 1836, Hist. nat. Insectes (Spec. gen. Lepid.) 1: 142. In the introduction to the volume, pages 1-154, Boisduval reviewed earlier classifications of Lepidoptera and designated as many as three different type-species for each generic name. In his `Exposé de notre méthode, pages 155-690, no type-species designation was made for any of the genera that he himself used. Under the Code, Article 69(a)(iii), the type-species designation of an author is eligible for consideration if he states that it is the type'... and if it is clear that he himself accepts it is the type-species'. Boisduval's type-designations, although clearly stated, do not fulfil the last requirement and so are invalid. Even though Boisduval's 1836 work was well known to lepidopterists, the type-designations contained in it have not been accepted, either by Hemming or by other authors. The acceptance of Boisduval's type-species designation in the case of Chaonia would make no difference to the generic concept. Chaonia was again proposed by Stephens, 1829 [June], Nom. Br. Insects: 39; and 1829 [July], Syst. Cat. Br Insects (2): 44.

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c