Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Cleosiris

Number: 6527.0
In Author: Boisduval & Guenée
Author: Boisduval
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/42348#page/102/mode/2up
Family: Callidulidae
Genus: Cleosiris
Journal: Hist. nat. Ins.
Year: 1836
Homonym Count: 1.0
Page: 6, pl.23, fig.3, Explic. planches 6
Part: Plates
Ref Id: 510.0
Status: Junior objective synonym
Subfamily: Callidulinae
Superfamily: Calliduloidea
Volume: 1
Senior Syn: TETRAGONUS
Senior Syn Author: Geyer
Senior Syn Page: 17
Senior Syn Year: 1832
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des: by monotypy
Type Des Comment: (but included as *catamita Hübner, an incorrect subsequent spelling and an incorrect authorship)
Type Sp Author: Geyer
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/45770#page/149/mode/2up
Type Sp In Author: Hübner
Type Sp Journal: Zutr. Samml. exot. Schmett.
Type Sp Page: 17, pl.[113], figs 653, 654
Type Sp Volume: 4
Type Sp Year: 1832
Type Sp Ref Id: 2035.0
Type Sp Genus: Tetragonus
Type Sp: catamitus
Memo Links: ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callidulidae', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=CLEOSIRIS']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- The name Cleosiris was published by Boisduval on the legend to a plate on which all the other species figured were butterflies. It was presumably for this reason that this generic name came to be listed as the name of a butterfly. It was mentioned in 1875 (Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 143) by Scudder who quite correctly stated that the single species figured by Boisduval was not a butterfly. It is in fact a moth which, as shown above, had already been named and figured by Geyer in his conuation of Hübner's Zuträge at the time when Boisduval's plate appeared. (It may be noted that the name Cleosiris Boisduval is invalid, being a junior objective synonym of Tetragonus Geyer.) Cowan (1970: 16) stated:- The title of Boisduval's "1836" [cf. title-page] (in Roret, Suite àBuffon, Hist, nat. Ins.) Spec. gén. Lépid. 1 has become garbled into "Consid. gén. Lépid 1", or a variant, in a large block of entries between Calais (: 85) and Gamana (: 195). The date is wrongly given as [1836] throughout. Fletcher (1979) stated:- A junior objective synonym of Tetragonus Geyer, 1832.

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c