Itylos
| Number: | 14933.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| In Author: | Seitz | |
| Author: | Draudt | |
| Family: | Lycaenidae | |
| Genus: | Itylos | |
| Journal: | Gross-Schmett. Erde. | |
| Year: | 1921 | |
| Homonym Count: | 2.0 | |
| Page: | 821 | |
| Ref Id: | 9431.0 | |
| Status: | Available name | |
| Subfamily: | Polyommatinae | |
| Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
| Tribe: | Polyommatini | |
| Volume: | 5 | |
| Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
| Type Des Ref Id: | 2539.0 | |
| Type Des: | by subsequent designation by | |
| Type Des Author: | Hemming | |
| Type Des Year: | 1929 | |
| Type Des Journal: | Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. | |
| Type Des Title: | Annals and Magazine of Natural History / London | |
| Type Des Series: | (10) | |
| Type Des Volume: | 3 | |
| Type Des Page: | 240 | |
| Type Sp Author: | Staudinger | |
| Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/45257#page/94/mode/2up | |
| Type Sp Journal: | Dt. ent. Z. | |
| Type Sp Page: | 77, pl.2, fig.8 | |
| Type Sp Volume: | 7 | |
| Type Sp Year: | 1894 | |
| Type Sp Ref Id: | 5511.0 | |
| Type Sp Genus: | Cupido | |
| Type Sp: | speciosa | |
| Memo Links: | ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=ITYLOS', 'http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Celastrina_a.htm', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycaenidae'] | |
| Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- In 1945 (Psyche 52 : 38) Nabokov drew attention to the fact that, when establishing this nominal genus, in which he placed nine nominal species, Draudt had observed that two of these - titicaca Weymer (Lycaena titicaca Weymer 1890) and speciosa Staudinger - belonged to a somewhat different group from the others; on this basis Nabokov sought to argue that these two species had been only doubtfully referred to the genus by its author and therefore that neither was eligible to be selected as the type-species. Nabokov thereupon selected Cupido moza Staudinger, [1894] (loc. cit. 7 : 79-80, pl. 2, fig. 5) as the type-species of this genus. It is true, as Nabokov remarked, that Draudt divided into two groups the species which he placed in this genus, but he certainly did not say anything which would warrant the view that of the nine included nominal species Draudt regarded seven as belonging to the genus Itylos strictly interpreted, the other two species to a different group only doubtfully included in the genus. The contention advanced by Nabokov is therefore considered to be unsound, the view here taken being taken that the nine originally included species were all equally eligible for selection as the type-species and therefore that the selection of Cupido speciosa Staudinger as type-species made in 1929 was perfectly valid under the Code. The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). See images at Butterflies of America. |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/14917/1677508006952
Retrieved: 22 Nov 2024 10:24:12 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/14917
Retrieved: 22 Nov 2024 10:24:12 (UTC)
Additional Information
| Format | unknown |
|---|---|
| License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
| Dataset | buttmoth |
| Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
| Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
| Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |