Pseudonica
Number: | 24732.0 | |
---|---|---|
In Author: | Wytsman | |
Author: | Kirby | |
Family: | Nymphalidae | |
Genus: | Pseudonica | |
Journal: | Samml. exot. Schmett. | |
Year: | 1900 | |
Homonym Count: | 1.0 | |
Page: | 28 | |
Ref Id: | 3131.0 | |
Status: | Junior objective synonym | |
Subfamily: | Biblidinae | |
Subtribe: | Epiphilina | |
Superfamily: | Papilionoidea | |
Tribe: | Biblidini | |
Volume: | 2 | |
Senior Syn: | NICA | |
Senior Syn Author: | Hübner | |
Senior Syn Page: | pl.[17] | |
Senior Syn Year: | 1826 | |
Type Country: | See BHL scanned Type-species page | |
Type Des: | (through Article 67.8 (replacement names)) | |
Type Sp Author: | Godart | |
Type Sp Bhl Page: | http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/78660#page/80/mode/2up | |
Type Sp Journal: | Encycl. méth. Hist. nat. | |
Type Sp Page: | 406 | |
Type Sp Part: | (Ins.) (2) | |
Type Sp Year: | 1824 | |
Type Sp Ref Id: | 2064.0 | |
Type Sp Genus: | Nymphalis | |
Type Sp: | flavilla | |
Memo Links: | ['http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=PSEUDONICA', 'http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymphalidae'] | |
Memo: | Hemming (1967) stated:- Kirby introduced the name Pseudonica as a replacement for Nica Hübner, [1826], which he rejected on the ground that it was invalid as being a junior homonym of Nika Risso, 1816 (Hist. nat. Crust. : 84). The question of the criteria to be adopted for determining whether any two generic names were homonyms of one another was a matter of doubt, both when Kirby published this replacement, which was more than thirty years before the International Code of Berlin (1901), and also after the promulgation of that Code, until its revision by the London Congress in 1958. In the revised Code now in force it is provided (Article 56 (a)) that any two generic names are not to be treated as homonyms of one another if they differ in spelling by a single letter. In consequence, (a) Nica Hübner and Nika Risso are not homonyms of one another, (b) Nica is not invalid under the Law of Homonymy, and (c) being, an available name is not in need of replacement. Accordingly, the replacement name Pseudonica Kirby is invalid, as a junior objective synonym of Nica Hübner. Cowan (1970: 54) stated:- "more than 30 years before to read - in the year of". The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008). |
Cite this as
We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:
To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.
Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.
Version Permanent URL for this version of the record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/24703/1677508006952
Retrieved: 22 Dec 2024 08:04:09 (UTC)
Latest Permanent URL for the most up to date record data:
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/record/c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c/24703
Retrieved: 22 Dec 2024 08:04:09 (UTC)
Additional Information
Format | unknown |
---|---|
License | Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike |
Dataset | buttmoth |
Dataset ID | f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457 |
Resource | Butterflies and Moths of the World |
Resource ID | c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c |