Skip to content

Data Portal

Explore and download the Museum’s research and collections data.

Argyrea

Number: 2649.0
Author: Billberg
Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/105024#page/88/mode/2up
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Argyrea
Journal: Enum. Ins. Mus. Billb.
Year: 1820
Homonym Count: 1.0
Of Value: ;
Page: 77
Ref Id: 455.0
Status: Unjustified emendation
Subfamily: Heliconiinae
Subtribe: Argynnina
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Tribe: Argynnini
Senior Syn: ARGYREUS
Senior Syn Author: Scopoli
Senior Syn Page: 431
Senior Syn Year: 1777
Type Country: See BHL scanned Type-species page
Type Des: (through Article 67.8 (replacement names))
Type Sp Author: Linnaeus
Type Sp Bhl Page: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/137240#page/258/mode/2up
Type Sp Journal: Systema Naturae
Type Sp Of: ;
Type Sp Page: 785
Type Sp Series: (Edn 12)
Type Sp Year: 1767
Type Sp Ref Id: 3528.0
Type Sp Genus: Papilio
Type Sp: niphe
Memo Links: ['http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/gbn/Lamas_Genera_04ii08.xls', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/127039', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymphalidae', 'http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/search?searchTerm=ARGYREA']
Memo: Hemming (1967) stated:- An Unjustified Emendation of Argyreus Scopoli, 1777. When I dealt with this name in 1933 (Entomologist 66 : 197), there were no clear provisions in the Code regarding either the status of names published as emendations of older names or the criteria to be adopted for determining when one generic name should be regarded as a homonym of another. As regards the first of these questions, I thought it best to select as the type-species of this genus the nominal species Papilio paphia Linnaeus, 1758, in order to make this name a junior objective synonym of Argynnis Fabricius, 1807 ; as regards the second point, I treated Argyrea Billberg as a junior homonym of Argyria Hübner, 1818 Zutr. z. Samml. exot. Schmett. 1 : 28, 30. Both the questions in doubt in 1933 have since been clarified by the International Congresses of Zoology and revised provisions have been inserted in the Code. On the first of the above questions the Code provides (Article 33) that an Emendation of a generic name takes the same type-species as the name so emended ; accordingly, my selection in 1933 of Papilio paphia Linnaeus as the type-species of Argyrea is invalid, that emendation taking automatically as its type-species the same species as Argyreus Scopoli, namely Papilio niphe Linnaeus. On the second of the above points, the revised Code provides (Article 56 (a)) that names are not to be treated as homonyms of one another if they differ in spelling even by a single letter. Under this provision Argyrea Billberg and Argyria Hübner are not homonyms of one another. The name Argyrea Billberg is invalid, as being an Unjustified Emendation of Argyreus Scopoli, 1777, and is therefore a junior objective synonym of that name. Cowan (1970) stated:- "ARGYREA Billberg, 1820. Unjustified Emendation (deliberate)." Cowan (1970: 42) stated:- "line 1 to end- ([genus refrence] plus [the page numbers] - vi, vii)". The higher classification used here follows Lamas (2008).

Cite this as

We track changes to records and therefore you have a choice of citation options:

To cite the most up to date record data use the Latest URL.

Or to cite this specific version of a record's data, ensuring any followers of the link see the same data every time they visit the link, use the Version URL.

Additional Information

Format unknown
License Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
Dataset buttmoth
Dataset ID f8bc9b9c-009a-4689-bd01-ed621095c457
Resource Butterflies and Moths of the World
Resource ID c1727662-2d1e-426f-818c-d144552a747c